Dealing
with High-Sea Piracy
When the captain
and crew members of the Ship M V Rak Carrier that sank off Mumbai Coaston 4th August, 2011 were rescued, little did
they know that they would be arrested soon after. They were arrested under IPC Section
336 dealing with endangering the life or personal safety of others. An FIR was also registered against the
owner of the ship. While it
is easier to deal with such cases that happen in the Indian territorial water,
it becomes a much more complex issue when an accident or piracy takes place in
international water. Till date India did not have any law to deal with the
ticklish problem of piracy in high seas. In the absence of a specific law to
counter piracy, prosecuting the arrested pirates had also become a legal
problem. On 24th April,
2012, the long-awaited Piracy Bill was introduced in Parliament by E. Ahmed,
MoS for Ministry of External Affairs. The
Standing Committee on External Affairs is in the process of finalizing the
Bill. The Bill proposed to
hand out death penalty for committing piracy on the high seas or in India ’s Exclusive Economic Zone
which stretches to 200 nautical miles from the coast.
The Piracy Bill,
2012, inter alia, provides for the following, namely:-
“to define the expression “piracy” so as
to include various acts, as given in 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law
of the Sea as acts of piracy;
to provide punishment for an act of
piracy, attempt to commit piracy and accomplice to piracy;
confers power on any Gazetted officer of
the Central Government or of a State Government with the powers of arrest of
any person, investigation and prosecution exercisable by a police officer under
the Code of Criminal Procedure;
to specify by the Central Government
after consultation with the Chief Justice of concerned High Court, by
notification, one or more Court of Session in the State to be Designated Court
for providing speedy trial of the offences under the proposed legislation and
the territorial jurisdiction of each such Court;
provides for application of Code of
Criminal Procedure in the proceedings before a Designated Court ; provisions relating to
bail of accused persons;
provision as to extradition of persons involved in an
act of piracy;
for the purpose of geographic scope, to
extend the proposed legislation to the exclusive economic zone of India.”
The act of sea piracy has been there
since time immemorial. It
has figured in fairy tales as also in the economic histories. India ’s regular contact with the
West through Sea routes began after Alexandar’s invasion. Magasthenes had mentioned that many
Greeks had flocked to the Mauryan Capital Patliputra for trade during that
period. The Ptolemaic
rulers tried to promote direct trade by sea routes between Indiaand Egypt by constructing ports like Berenice
and Myos-hormos. But the
all sea route was not very popular. Very
few would dare to venture on this voyage for commerce for various reasons,
including Piracy. Regular
Maritime contact between India and Egypt began after 23 B.C. Indian traders
sailed directly to Somali ports and then reached Egypt .
The excruciating pain and anguish that
the relatives of the hijacked passengers and crew members of the ship pass
through is understandable. For
one thing the Government cannot possibly negotiate with the pirates. Secondly, the multiplicity of agencies
- Ministries of External Affairs, Home, Shipping, Defence, et al - makes things
more complicated. More than
anything else, in the absence of strong anti-piracy law, the Government could
have done little to bring the pirates to justice. One has to respect the prevailing
International Law and territorial water limit.
Pirates generally set to sail in small
dhows and skiffs armed with archaic machine guns and pistols. There is always a
possibility of attacking a ship again that has been released by a different
group of pirates. Same
group of pirates generally do not re-attack the ship after getting the ransom
money. Ransom money is generally paid through a private agency. If the pirates
feel they are running out of their food and diesel, they mount pressure and add
the cost of feeding, diesel and maintenance. After receiving the money the pirates
generally leave the hijacked ship and escape in their smaller boat / dhow. The
most curious case of Somali pirates is that they need huge money to feed the
hostages for months together, if not for years, when they take the hostages to
the shore. If they get a
hint that the bargain is going to be tough and long-drawn, they take the
hostages to land and add the cumulative expenses for keeping the hostages
alive.
Generally,
merchant ships carry nationals and crew of various countries and when a ship is
hijacked the countries don’t involve in negotiations directly and the owner of
the ship is asked to pay the ransom. The owner of the ship, in most of the
cases, washes his hands off by saying that he doesn’t have the amount demanded
by the pirates or more conveniently, the ship itself is very old and not the
ransom’s worth. More
importantly, he knows that pressure will also be mounted on all the countries
whose nationals are on board.
Although allowing armed guards on board
ships is an option, but knee-jerk reactions from the guards can spell disaster.
A case in point is the unfortunate incident involving the guards of the Italian
shipEnrica Lexie wherein two fishermen from Kerala were
mistakenly killed. The government has though introduced a mechanism to allow
armed guards on board ships. The Ministry of Shipping has issued Guidelines
regarding deployment of armed guards in Indian Merchant Ships as a part of the
various steps undertaken by the Government to combat the piracy in Gulf of Aden .
The Ministry considered the fact that about 35% of the ship transiting in these
waters deploy armed security guards and that the pirates generally don’t attack
ships with armed guards on board.
The Guidelines have accordingly been
issued by the Ministry of Shipping in consultation with Ministry of External
Affairs, Ministry of Defence, Ministry of Home Affairs, Department of Revenue
(CBEC), Navy and Coast Guard. As per these guidelines the ship owners are
allowed to engage Private Maritime Security Companies (PMSC), who are properly
selected and vetted. All Indian ships visiting Indian ports are to furnish
details of security personnel on board, the fire–arms carried by them and the
details of license issued etc. to the Port authority, Customs, Coast Guard and
the Navy. Foreign merchant vessels visiting Indian ports with security guards
are also required to follow similar procedure.
Apart from bringing out the Piracy
Bill 2012, the Government has taken various measures to combat piracy. These are, inter-alia:
An Inter-Ministerial Group of Officers has been set
up to deal with hostage situation arising out of the hijacking of merchant
vessels with Indian crew on board.
A Notice has been issued by the
Directorate General of Shipping detailing elaborate anti-piracy measures (Best
Management Practices) including safe house/citadel.
Sailing vessels banned to ply in waters south or west
of line joining Salalah and Male.
Naval escort provided by Indian Naval Ships in Gulf of Aden .
Enhanced vigil by Indian Navy in Indian Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ) and westward up to 65 degree east longitude.
Guidelines for deployment of armed guards
on Indian merchant ships issued.
The Directorate General of Shipping under
Ministry of Shipping has issued a notice on 7th March, 2012 for the safe navigation of
merchant ships on Indian coast and advising all merchant vessels to take note
of dense fishing traffic on the Indian coast. Merchant Ships have been advised
to navigate with extreme caution when approaching up to 50 nautical miles from
the Indian coast. Indian
Coast Guard has also issued a warning on 23rd February, 2012 in which all vessels
have been warned that fishing is carried out up to 50 nautical miles from the
coast and vessels should not mistake fishing boats as skiffs and Piracy Armed
Groups (PAGs).
The
35-member Indian Ocean Naval Symposium (IONS) held a meeting recently in Cape
Town ,South Africa to tackle, inter-alia, the piracy
issue. A decision to evolve
certain papers including standard operating procedures was taken involving
three countries – Australia , Singapore and India . Although the focus on India was on Humanitarian Assistance and
Disaster Relief (HADR), India took
the opportunity to highlight the piracy issue as some parts of the Arabian Sea continued to be a high risk area for
piracy.
No comments:
Post a Comment